Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of John McCall et al., Respondents, The Villiage of Saratoga Springs, Appellant, 1890 — 121 N.Y. 704 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of John McCall et al., Respondents, The Villiage of Saratoga Springs, Appellant
121 N.Y. 704·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of John McCall et al., Respondents, The Villiage of Saratoga Springs, Appellant.
(Argued June 16, 1890;
decided June 24, 1890.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made February 14, 1890, which affirmed an order of Special Term appointing commissioners to appraise the damages to lands and buildings of the petitioners caused by the change and alteration of the grade of certain streets in the village of Saratoga Springs.
L. B. Piles for appellant.
William H. McCall for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Order affirmed.