Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
American Grocery Company, Appellant, v. Charles M. Pratt, Respondent, Impleaded, etc., 1900 — 161 N.Y. 649 · caselaw · US
General
American Grocery Company, Appellant, v. Charles M. Pratt, Respondent, Impleaded, etc.
161 N.Y. 649·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
American Grocery Company, Appellant, v. Charles M. Pratt, Respondent, Impleaded, etc.
American Gh'oeery Oo. v. Pratt, 36 App. Div. 152, affirmed.
(Argued January 10, 1900;
decided January 30, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 20, 1899, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon a dismissal of the complaint at a Trial Term.
D. M. Porter for appellant.
Lewis Oass Ledyard for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.