Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Nick v. State Highway Commission of Wisconsin, 1964 — 376 U.S. 963 · caselaw · US
General
Nick v. State Highway Commission of Wisconsin
376 U.S. 963·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 843.
Nick v. State Highway Commission of Wisconsin.
Elliot N. Walstead for petitioner. George Thompson, Attorney General of Wisconsin, Lyle E. Strahan, Deputy Attorney General, A. J. Feifarek, Assistant Attorney General, and George Brunner Schwahn for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Certiorari denied.