Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Paulina Colburn, Respondent, v. Adam Marsh et al., Appellants, 1895 — 144 N.Y. 657 · caselaw · US
General
Paulina Colburn, Respondent, v. Adam Marsh et al., Appellants
144 N.Y. 657·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Paulina Colburn, Respondent, v. Adam Marsh et al., Appellants.
(Argued December 11, 1894;
decided January 15, 1895.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made March 28, 1893, which reversed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee and granted a new trial.
J. I. Fowler for appellants.
William II. Henderson for respondent.
Reported below, 68 Hun 269.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion helow.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.