Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of Proving the Last Will and Testament of Isabella P. Sarauw, Deceased. Charles Pruyn, as Executor, etc., Appellant, v. Frederick W. Sarauw, Respondent, 1891 — 125 N.Y. 734 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of Proving the Last Will and Testament of Isabella P. Sarauw, Deceased. Charles Pruyn, as Executor, etc., Appellant, v. Frederick W. Sarauw, Respondent
125 N.Y. 734·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Ail concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Proving the Last Will and Testament of Isabella P. Sarauw, Deceased. Charles Pruyn, as Executor, etc., Appellant, v. Frederick W. Sarauw, Respondent.
(Argued January 23, 1891;
decided February 6, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court it the third judicial department, entered upon an order made May 27,1889, which affirmed a decree of the surrogate ■of Albany county.
W. H. Van Steenbergh for appellant.
Charles II. Mills for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
Ail concur.
Judgment affirmed.