Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Berra v. United States, 1955 — 350 U.S. 910 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Berra v. United States
350 U.S. 910·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 60.
Berra v. United States.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted, limited to question (2) presented by the petition for the writ, which reads as follows:
“(2) Whether in a prosecution under a felony indictment for tax evasion under Section 145 (b) of the 1939 Internal Revenue Code, the trial court is required by Rule 31 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to give a requested misdemeanor instruction under Section 3616 (a) of the 1939 Internal Revenue Code, and thus allow the jury to determine whether defendant committed the greater or lesser offense.”
Stanley M. Rosenblum and Mark M. Hennelly for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Holland, Ellis N. Slack and Dickinson Thatcher for the United States.