Harriet R. McKim, Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant; Thomas Buchanan Winthrop, Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant

Harriet R. McKim, Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant. Thomas Buchanan Winthrop, Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant. McKim v. Manhattan B. Oo., 17 App. Div. 684, affirmed. Winthrop v. Manhattan B. Oo., 17 App. Div. 509, affirmed. (Argued November 27, 1899; decided January 9, 1900.) Appeals from judgments of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 24-, 1897, affirming judgments in favor of the respectiv e plaintiffs, entered upon decisions of the court on trial at Special Term. John F. Dillon, JuTAen T. Drnies and Arthur O. Townsend, for appellant. John M. Bowers for respondents. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. These two appeals involve the same questions which were raised in the Kernochan Case (161 N. Y. 339), decided at the present term, and the judgments should be affirmed upon the opinion in that case, with costs. All concur, except Parker, Oh. J., not sitting, and O’Brien, J., dissenting. ' affirmed.