Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Elizabeth Fisher, Respondent, v Appellant, 1896 — 149 N.Y. 579 · caselaw · US
General
Elizabeth Fisher, Respondent, v Appellant
149 N.Y. 579·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Elizabeth Fisher, Respondent, v Appellant
Fisher v. Rankin, 78 Hun, 407, affi
(Argued April 10, 1896;
decide'7
Appeal from judgr Supreme Court in F an order made J favor of plain*order denw
Robert E. Deyo for appellant.
Christopher Fine for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Yann, J., not voting.