Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Superior Oil Co. v. United Gas Improvement Co. et al., 1961 — 365 U.S. 879 · caselaw · US
General
Superior Oil Co. v. United Gas Improvement Co. et al.
365 U.S. 879·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 780.
Superior Oil Co. v. United Gas Improvement Co. et al.
R. B. Voight and H. W. Varner for petitioner.
J. David Mann, Jr., William W. Ross and John E. Holtzinger, Jr. for United Gas Improvement Company, and Kent H. Brown for Public Service Commission of New York, respondents.
David Berger and Robert M. Beckman filed a brief for the City of Philadelphia, as amicus curiae, in opposition to the petition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.