Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Illinois ex rel. Sankstone v. Jarecki, Judge of the County Court of Cook County, et al., 1953 — 346 U.S. 861 · caselaw · US
General
Illinois ex rel. Sankstone v. Jarecki, Judge of the County Court of Cook County, et al.
346 U.S. 861·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 412.
Illinois ex rel. Sankstone v. Jarecki, Judge of the County Court of Cook County, et al.
Frank Michels for appellant. Latham Castle, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General, for Carpentier et al.; and Bernard J. Korzen, Gordon Nash, Vincent P. Flood and James C. Murray for Holz-man et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
Per Curiam:
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.