Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Anna V. GALE, Appellant, v. David FREIDENRICH, Trustee In Bankruptcy of the Estate of Atlas Smelting, Mining & Refining Corporation, Bankrupt, Appellee, 1934 — 71 F.2d 1006 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Anna V. GALE, Appellant, v. David FREIDENRICH, Trustee In Bankruptcy of the Estate of Atlas Smelting, Mining & Refining Corporation, Bankrupt, Appellee
71 F.2d 1006·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Anna V. GALE, Appellant, v. David FREIDENRICH, Trustee In Bankruptcy of the Estate of Atlas Smelting, Mining & Refining Corporation, Bankrupt, Appellee.
No. 7381.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
W. W. Sanderson, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuiiffe and Hayes & Wren, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a disallowanceof a claim in bankruptcy based upon an award of the Industrial Accident Commission of the state of California. Since the-‘appeal was taken, Congress has enacted an. amendment to the Bankruptcy Act authorizing the allowance of such a claim in bankruptcy and making the act applicable to all pending proceedings (Act June 7, 1934, §; 4,- amending section 63, su!)d. (a), adding clause (6), thereto, and subdivision (b), 11 USCA § 103). The parties have stipulated to submit the appeal without brief or argument other than reference to the above-mentioned Act of June 7, 1934.
Order reversed, and matter .remanded to the District Court for allowance of the claim with priority as provided by the act of Congress; each party to pay his own costs on appeal.