Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John O. Murdock, Appellant, v. Lewis S. Abbott et al., Executors, etc., Respondents, 1886 — 102 N.Y. 673 · caselaw · US
General
John O. Murdock, Appellant, v. Lewis S. Abbott et al., Executors, etc., Respondents
102 N.Y. 673·New York Court of Appeals·1886·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John O. Murdock, Appellant, v. Lewis S. Abbott et al., Executors, etc., Respondents.
(Argued November 23, 1885;
decided April 20, 1886.)
Isaac JB. Maynard for appellant.
William Toumans for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed