General
Margaret Cosgrove, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant; Emma T. Barringer, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant
94 N.Y. 652·New York Court of Appeals·1884·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Margaret Cosgrove, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant. Emma T. Barringer, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant.
(Argued January 21, 1884 ;
decided February 5, 1884.)
Frank Loomis for appellant.
Homer A. Nelson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgments affirmed.