General
Frederick McEwen, Respondent, v. Thomas Dimond et al., Appellants
180 N.Y. 544·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frederick McEwen, Respondent, v. Thomas Dimond et al., Appellants.
McEwen v. Dimond, 87 App. Div. 633, affirmed.
(Submitted January 13, 1905;
decided January 31, 1905.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 4, 1903, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by" the court.
Charles De Hart Brower and William H. Harris for appellants.
Thomas C. Ennever and William H. Beam for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chllen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ. Not voting: Gray, J.