Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board et al., 1956 — 350 U.S. 957 · caselaw · US
General
United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board et al.
350 U.S. 957·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 530.
United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Probable jurisdiction noted.
Harold A. Cranefield and Max Raskin for appellant. Vernon W. Thomson, Attorney General of Wisconsin, Stewart G. Honeck, Deputy Attorney General, and Beatrice Lampert, Assistant Attorney General, for the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, and John F. Lane for the Kohler Co., appellees. J. Albert Woll, Arthur J. Goldberg and David E. Feller filed a brief for the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, as amicus curiae, urging that probable jurisdiction be noted.