Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ludwig SLABOSZEWSKI, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee, 1934 — 70 F.2d 1021 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Ludwig SLABOSZEWSKI, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
70 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ludwig SLABOSZEWSKI, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
No. 5207.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
April 21, 1934.
See, also, 68 F.(2d) 369.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the motion on behalf of defendant-appellant filed March 13, 1934, in the above-entitled cause, and in pursuance of the decisions recently rendered by the Supreme Court of the United States in the cases of United States v. Chambers and Gibson, 291 U. S. -, 54 S. Ct. 434, 78 L. Ed. -, 89 A. L. R. 1510, and Massey v. United States (U. S.) 54 S. Ct. 532, 78 L. Ed. -, it is ordered that the judgment or sentence entered in this ease be, and the same is hereby, reversed, and the cause remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania, with direction to vacate the said judgment, to dismiss the indictment, and to discharge the said defendant.