Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114, et al., 1965 — 382 U.S. 912 · caselaw · US
General
Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114, et al.
382 U.S. 912·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
November 15, 1965.
No. 45.
Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114, et al.
Russell E. Leasure and Ralph Atkinson on the motion.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. (Certiorari granted, 381 U. S. 923.) The motion of Schnell Tool & Die Corp. et al. is granted insofar as permission to file a brief, as amici curiae, is requested, and is denied insofar as permission to participate in oral argument is requested.