Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James McNevin, Appellant, v. The Solvay Process Company, Respondent, 1901 — 167 N.Y. 530 · caselaw · US
General
James McNevin, Appellant, v. The Solvay Process Company, Respondent
167 N.Y. 530·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James McNevin, Appellant, v. The Solvay Process Company, Respondent.
(Argued March 22, 1901;
decided April 30, 1901.)
McNevin v. Solvay Process Co., 33 App. Div. 610, affirmed.
Appeal from an order-of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered August 5, 1898, which reversed a judgment of the Onondaga County Court entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial and granted a new trial.-
P. J. Ryan and H. M. Van Bergen for appellant.
William G. Tracy and John L. King for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for defendant on the stipulation, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.