Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Perlstein et al. v. United States, 1942 — 316 U.S. 678 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Perlstein et al. v. United States
316 U.S. 678·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Mr. Justice Murphy took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1079.
Perlstein et al. v. United States.
May 4, 1942.
Mr. Paul M. Salsburg for petitioners. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Messrs. Sewall Key, Arnold Raum, and Ellis N. Slack for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Mr. Justice Murphy took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.