General
Thomas Fanning, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
151 N.Y. 627·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas Fanning, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
Fanning v. Ff. T. O. & H. R. R. R. Oo., 73 Hun, 616, affirmed.
(Submitted October 23, 1896;
decided December 1, 1896.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 14, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.
Hiscock & Doheny for appellant.
Lawrence T. Jones and George McGowan for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Martin and Vann, JJ., not sitting.