In the Matter of the Application of Orville M. Barkley to Substitute Frank C. Sargent as Attorney of Record for the Plaintiff in the Place of S. K. & B. C. Williams, his Attorneys of Record, in an Action Entitled Orville M. Barkley v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company. S. K. & B. C. Williams, Appellants; Orville M. Barkley, Respondent

In the Matter of the Application of Orville M. Barkley to Substitute Frank C. Sargent as Attorney of Record for the Plaintiff in the Place of S. K. & B. C. Williams, his Attorneys of Record, in an Action Entitled Orville M. Barkley v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company. S. K. & B. C. Williams, Appellants; Orville M. Barkley, Respondent. Matter of Barkley, 43 App. Div. 697, appeal dismissed. (Argued January 9, 1900; decided January 23, 1900.) Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 24, 1899, which confirmed the report of a referee and ordered the substitution of Frank C. Sargent as attorney for the plaintiff in the above-entitled action in place of S. K. & B. C. Williams; also an appeal from an intermediate order of the same court, entered December 15, 1898, which reversed an order of the Special Term denying a motion for the substitution of attorneys in the above-entitled action. Stephen K. William,s and Francis M. Fvnch for appellants. Frank G. Sargent for respondent. [MAJORITY] Appeal dismissed, without costs; no opinion. Concur : Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Yann, JJ.