General
William Briggs, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Kansas
242 U.S. 615·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 113.
William Briggs, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Kansas.
In error to the Supreme. Court •of the State of Kansas.
Submitted November 15, 1916.
Decided December 4, 1916.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Dreyer v. Illinois, 187 U. S. 71, 83-84; Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line, 211 U. S. 210, 225; (2) Baldwin v. Kansas, 129 U. S. 52; Spies v. Illinois, 123 U. S. 131; Jacobi v. Alabama, 187 U. S. 133; (3) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 311; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Insurance Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; (4) Moore v. Missouri, 159 U. S. 673; McDonald v. Massachusetts, 180 U. S. 311; Graham v. West Virginia, 224 U. S. 616; Carlesi v. New York, 233 U. S. 51. Mr. A. M. Harvey for the plaintiff in error. Mr. James P. Coleman for the defendant in error.