Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary J. Westerfield et al., Appellants, v. Thomas Rogers, Individually and as Trustee under the Will of Jason Rogers, Deceased, et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others, 1904 — 178 N.Y. 569 · caselaw · US
General
Mary J. Westerfield et al., Appellants, v. Thomas Rogers, Individually and as Trustee under the Will of Jason Rogers, Deceased, et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others
178 N.Y. 569·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary J. Westerfield et al., Appellants, v. Thomas Rogers, Individually and as Trustee under the Will of Jason Rogers, Deceased, et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others.
(Submitted April 27, 1903;
decided March 22, 1904.)
Motion to amend remittitur. (See 174 N. T. 230; 175 N. Y. 499.)
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and the clerk of the Supreme Court requested to return the remittitur in this action to this court to the end that the same may be amended so that the judgment of the Appellate Division shall be reversed, and the judgment entered on the report of the referee modified by inserting Schedule B of the referee’s report, and as so modified affirmed.