Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SALUDA CRUSHED STONE COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. W. NICOLL, as Administrator of the Estate of Jesse E. Nicoll, Defendant in Error, 1927 — 19 F.2d 1021 · caselaw · US
Corporations
SALUDA CRUSHED STONE COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. W. NICOLL, as Administrator of the Estate of Jesse E. Nicoll, Defendant in Error
19 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SALUDA CRUSHED STONE COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. W. NICOLL, as Administrator of the Estate of Jesse E. Nicoll, Defendant in Error.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
June 15, 1927.
No. 2545.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of South Carolina, at Greenville.
Haynsworth & Haynsworth, B. F. Martin, and E. M. Blythe, all of Greenville, S. C., for plaintiff in error.
Bonham, Price & Poag, of Greenville, S. C., for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Consent order, remanding ease to District Court for further proceedings in accordance with the settlement, agreed upon between the parties filed.