Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of Joseph Benedetto, Respondent. Salvatore Caporale, Appellant, 1905 — 183 N.Y. 538 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of Joseph Benedetto, Respondent. Salvatore Caporale, Appellant
183 N.Y. 538·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Joseph Benedetto, Respondent. Salvatore Caporale, Appellant.
(Argued November 20, 1905;
decided December 5, 1905.)
Matter of Benedetto, 93 App. Div. 623, affirmed.
Appeal from an order oí the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 17j 1.904, which affirraecj an order of Special Tern? granting a motion to cancel and discharge of record, a certain judgment heretofore recovered by the appellant against the petitioner.
Edward McKinley and Charles B. Mason for appellant.
Franklin Pierce for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., G-kay, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ.