Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Alabama; United States v. Mississippi; and United States v. Louisiana, 1965 — 382 U.S. 897 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. Alabama; United States v. Mississippi; and United States v. Louisiana
382 U.S. 897·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
November 5, 1965.
No. 23,
No. 24,
No. 25,
Original.
Original.
Original.
United States v. Alabama; United States v. Mississippi; and United States v. Louisiana.
Attorney General Katzenbach, Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Doar, Ralph S. Spritzer and Louis F. Claiborne for the United States.
Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama, and Gordon Madison, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant in No. 23, Original.
[MAJORITY]
The motions for leave to file bills of complaint are denied.
[For earlier order in these cases, see ante, p. 889.]