Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Petition of John Newton, Commissioner, etc., for the Appointment of Commissioners of Appraisal. In re Claim of the Female Academy of the Sacred Heart, Appellant, 1892 — 133 N.Y. 624 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Petition of John Newton, Commissioner, etc., for the Appointment of Commissioners of Appraisal. In re Claim of the Female Academy of the Sacred Heart, Appellant
133 N.Y. 624·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of John Newton, Commissioner, etc., for the Appointment of Commissioners of Appraisal. In re Claim of the Female Academy of the Sacred Heart, Appellant.
(Argued April 25, 1892;
decided May 6, 1892.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made September 21, 1891, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming the report of commissioners of appraisal.
James A. Deermxj for appellant.
Arthur N. Hasten for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.