Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jonas H. Lane et al., Appellants, v. John W. Wheelwright et al., Respondents., 1894 — 143 N.Y. 634 · caselaw · US
General
Jonas H. Lane et al., Appellants, v. John W. Wheelwright et al., Respondents.
143 N.Y. 634·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jonas H. Lane et al., Appellants, v. John W. Wheelwright et al., Respondents.
(Argued June 8, 1894;
decided June 22, 1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made'May 12, 1893,, which reversed a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and granted a new trial.
G. A. Clement for appellants.
Hamilton Wallis for respondents.
Reported below, 69 Hun, 180:
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below and for judgment absolute against plaintiffs on stipulation.
All concur.
Order affirmed and judgment accordingly.