Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. et al., 1960 — 364 U.S. 859 · caselaw · US
General
Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. et al.
364 U.S. 859·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 45.
Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. et al.
L. T. Rice, Henry F. Lippitt II, Milford Springer, Joseph R. Rensch, J. David Mann, Jr. and William W. Ross for movants.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 362 U. S. 948, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The motion of Southern California Gas Company et al. for leave to file brief, as amici curiae, is granted.