Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William Oppenheim, Respondent, v. John McGovern, Appellant, 1907 — 187 N.Y. 532 · caselaw · US
General
William Oppenheim, Respondent, v. John McGovern, Appellant
187 N.Y. 532·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Oppenheim, Respondent, v. John McGovern, Appellant.
Reported below, 115 App. Div. 135.
(Submitted January 7, 1907;
decided January 15, 1907.)
Motiow to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered October 24, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Terra without a jury.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the judgment was not appealable of right to the Court of Appeals, that permission to appeal had not been granted and that the appellant’s exceptions were frivolous. •
Morton Stein for motion.
John P. Everett opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.