Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application to Compel Frank E. Randall, Appellant, to Answer Certain Questions. The Western Gas and Fuel Company, Appellant; William E. Strong et al., Respondents, 1905 — 180 N.Y. 536 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application to Compel Frank E. Randall, Appellant, to Answer Certain Questions. The Western Gas and Fuel Company, Appellant; William E. Strong et al., Respondents
180 N.Y. 536·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application to Compel Frank E. Randall, Appellant, to Answer Certain Questions. The Western Gas and Fuel Company, Appellant; William E. Strong et al., Respondents.
Matter of Randall, 98 App. Div. 634, affirmed.
(Argued January 10, 1905;
decided January 24, 1905.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 5, 1904, which affirmed an order of Special Term punishing the appellant Randall for contempt.
Willard Parker Butler, Sanford Robinson and Julius S. Workum for appellants.
Frank E. Blackwell for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ.