Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jennie E. Brooks, Respondent, v. Restcome P. Conklin, Appellant, Impleaded with Others, 1905 — 181 N.Y. 506 · caselaw · US
General
Jennie E. Brooks, Respondent, v. Restcome P. Conklin, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
181 N.Y. 506·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jennie E. Brooks, Respondent, v. Restcome P. Conklin, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Brooks v. Conklin, 98 App. Div. 638, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted February 20, 1905;
decided February 28, 1905.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment entered November 30, 1904, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, affirming an interlocutory judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint.
The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal was taken from an interlocutory judgment without having first obtained the consent of the Appellate Division, as required-by section 190 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
J. Bradley Seott for motion.
No one opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs of appeal and ten dollars costs of motion.