Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Milk Control Board v. Eisenberg Farm Products, 1938 — 305 U.S. 589 · caselaw · US
General
Milk Control Board v. Eisenberg Farm Products
305 U.S. 589·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 426.
Milk Control Board v. Eisenberg Farm Products.
November 21, 1938.
Messrs. Guy K. Bard and Harry Polikoff for petitioner.
Mr. Thomas D. Caldwell for respondent.
By leave of Court, Messrs. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney General of New York, Henry Epstein, Solicitor General, Milo R. Kniffen, and Robert G. Blahey filed a brief on bebalf of the Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets of New York, as amicus curiae, in support of petitioner.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania granted.