General
Boston & Providence Railroad Stockholders Development Group v. United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit et al.
389 U.S. 967·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 661,
Misc.
Boston & Providence Railroad Stockholders Development Group v. United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit et al.
Armistead B. Rood on the motions.
Briefs in opposition to the latter motion were filed by James Garfield, James Wm. Moore and Robert W. Blanchette for Smith et al., Trustees of the property of New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co.; Robert W. Meserve for Boston & Providence Railroad Corp. Stockholders Committee; Acting Solicitor General Spritzer for the United States; and by Charles Y. Wadsworth for Boston & Providence Railroad Corp.
[MAJORITY]
(See No. 624, infra, p. 974.) Motion to dispense with printing extra copies of Appendix C to petition granted. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.