Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc., et al. (two judgments); Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. California Pharmacists Assn. et al.; Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. California Hospital Assn. et al.; Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc., et al.; Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. Dominguez, By and Through Her Mother and Next Friend Brown, et al.; and Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital et al., 2011 — 565 U.S. 1010 · caselaw · US
General
Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc., et al. (two judgments); Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. California Pharmacists Assn. et al.; Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. California Hospital Assn. et al.; Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc., et al.; Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. Dominguez, By and Through Her Mother and Next Friend Brown, et al.; and Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital et al.
565 U.S. 1010·Supreme Court of the United States·2011
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
November 4, 2011
No. 09-958.
No. 09-1158.
No. 10-283.
Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc., et al. (two judgments); Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. California Pharmacists Assn. et al.; Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. California Hospital Assn. et al.; Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc., et al.; Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. Dominguez, By and Through Her Mother and Next Friend Brown, et al.; and Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted sub nom. in No. 09-958, Maxwell-Jolly v. Independent Living Center of Southern Cal., Inc.; in No. 09-1158, Maxwell-Jolly v. California Pharmacists Assn.; Maxwell-Jolly v. California Hospital Assn.; Maxwell-Jolly v. Independent Living Center of Southern Cal., Inc.; Maxwell-Jolly v. Dominguez; in No. 10-288, Maxwell-Jolly v. Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital, 562 U. S. 1177.] The parties and the Solicitor General are directed to file supplemental briefs addressing the following question: “What should be the effect, if any, of the developments discussed in the letter submitted by the Solicitor General on October 28, 2011, on the proper disposition of this case?” Briefs, in letter format, limited to 10 pages, are to be filed simultaneously with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 2 p.m., Friday, November 18, 2011.