General
Augustus C. Pohl, Respondent, v. Charles E. Pontier et al., Appellants
142 N.Y. 654·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Augustus C. Pohl, Respondent, v. Charles E. Pontier et al., Appellants.
(Argued April 18, 1894;
decided May 1, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, entered upon an order made at the December term, 1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Charles Goldzier for appellants.
Alexander JBlumenstiel for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.