Securities

Philadelphia Company v. Guggenheim et al.; Philadelphia Company v. Pittsburgh; Philadelphia Company v. Baker et al.; Monongahela Street Railway Co. et al. v. Guggenheim et al.; Monongahela Street Railway Co. et al. v. Pittsburgh; and Monongahela Street Railway Co. et al. v. Baker et al.

329 U.S. 731·Supreme Court of the United States·1946

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

No. 359. No. 360. No. 361. No. 362. No. 363. No. 364. Philadelphia Company v. Guggenheim et al.; Philadelphia Company v. Pittsburgh; Philadelphia Company v. Baker et al.; Monongahela Street Railway Co. et al. v. Guggenheim et al.; Monongahela Street Railway Co. et al. v. Pittsburgh; and Monongahela Street Railway Co. et al. v. Baker et al. October 14, 1946. Mr. Thomas J. Munsch, Jr. for the Philadelphia Company. Wm. S. Moorhead and A. W. Henderson for petitioners in Nos. 362, 363 and 364. Joseph Nemerov and Maurice J. Dix for Guggenheim et al.; Anne X. Alpern and Leon Wald for the City of Pittsburgh; and H. F. Stambaugh for Baker et al., respondents. Solicitor General McGrath, Roger S. Foster and George Zolotar for the Securities & Exchange Commission, in opposition to the petitions. [MAJORITY] Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied. Reported below: 155 F. 2d 477.