Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Reamer v. Beall, U. S. Attorney, et al., 1974 — 419 U.S. 1029 · caselaw · US
General
Reamer v. Beall, U. S. Attorney, et al.
419 U.S. 1029·Supreme Court of the United States·1974
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. A-392.
Reamer v. Beall, U. S. Attorney, et al.
[MAJORITY]
Order entered by the Court on November 18, 1974 [ante, p. 1015], staying judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland is continued conditioned upon thé filing of a petition for writ of certiorari on or before December 24, 1974. Should such a petition be so filed on or before December 24, 1974, this order is to continue pending this Court’s action on the petition. If the petition for writ of certiorari is denied, this order is to terminate automatically. In the event the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, this order is to remain in effect pending the sending down of the judgment of this Court.