Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Market National Bank of New York, Appellant, v. The Pacific National Bank of Boston, Respondent, 1883 — 93 N.Y. 648 · caselaw · US
General
The Market National Bank of New York, Appellant, v. The Pacific National Bank of Boston, Respondent
93 N.Y. 648·New York Court of Appeals·1883·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Market National Bank of New York, Appellant, v. The Pacific National Bank of Boston, Respondent.
(Argued June 29,1883 ;
decided October 2, 1883.)
Abram Wakeman for appellant.
Willard Bartlett for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
,Agree to affirm on opinion in Raynor et al. v. Paoifio Nat. B’k (ante, p. 371).
All concur, except Andrews, J., absent.
Order affirmed.