General
Charles L. Rathborne, Appellant, v. Edward Hatch et al., Respondents
181 N.Y. 584·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles L. Rathborne, Appellant, v. Edward Hatch et al., Respondents.
Rathborne v. Hatch, 90 App. Div. 161, affirmed.
(Argued May 2, 1905;
decided May 30, 1905.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the-Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 15, 1904, affirming a a judgment in favor of defendants-entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term.
Charles N. Morgan and George E. Morgan for appellant.
Edward W. S. Johnston, Henry Tompkins and George Tompkins for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ.