Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Otto J. Lang, as Ancillary Executor, etc., Respondent, v. The Houston, West Street and Pavonia Ferry Railroad Company, Appellant, 1895 — 144 N.Y. 717 · caselaw · US
General
Otto J. Lang, as Ancillary Executor, etc., Respondent, v. The Houston, West Street and Pavonia Ferry Railroad Company, Appellant
144 N.Y. 717·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Otto J. Lang, as Ancillary Executor, etc., Respondent, v. The Houston, West Street and Pavonia Ferry Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued January 24, 1895;
decided February 8, 1895.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made December 12,1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict.
John J. Townsend for appellant.
George W. Hopkins for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Finch and Gray, JJ., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.