General
ORDER OF RAILWAY CONDUCTORS AND BRAKEMEN et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
388 U.S. 455·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ORDER OF RAILWAY CONDUCTORS AND BRAKEMEN et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 1093.
Decided June 12, 1967.
Harry Wilmarth for appellants.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al., and Robert H. Bierma and David L. Wilson for appellee Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.