Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Nathan C. Jessup, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Trustees of the Freeholders and Commonalty of the Town of Southampton, 1904 — 195 U.S. 624 · caselaw · US
General
Nathan C. Jessup, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Trustees of the Freeholders and Commonalty of the Town of Southampton
195 U.S. 624·Supreme Court of the United States·1904
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 25.
Nathan C. Jessup, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Trustees of the Freeholders and Commonalty of the Town of Southampton.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Argued October 27, 1904.
Decided October 31, 1904.
Mr. Charles M. Stafford for plaintiff tin error.
Mr. Thomas Young for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Cummings v. Chicago, 188 U. S. 410; Montgomery v. Portland, 190 U. S. 89. See Trustees v. Jessup, 162 N. Y. 122; Trustees v. Jessup, 173 N. Y. 84; People v. Jessup, 160 N. Y. 249.