Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Superintendent of the Poor of the County of Cattaraugus, Respondent, v. The Superintendent of the Poor of the County of Erie, Appellant, 1894 — 143 N.Y. 631 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
The Superintendent of the Poor of the County of Cattaraugus, Respondent, v. The Superintendent of the Poor of the County of Erie, Appellant
143 N.Y. 631·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Superintendent of the Poor of the County of Cattaraugus, Respondent, v. The Superintendent of the Poor of the County of Erie, Appellant.
(Argued June 7, 1894;
decided June 22, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made January 18, 1893, which directed judgment in favor of plaintiff upon a case submitted under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Allen c& Butterfield for appellant.
Mormon M. Allen for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.