Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Catharine W. Cooke, Respondent, v. Aaron A. Degrauw, Impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1889 — 112 N.Y. 658 · caselaw · US
General
Catharine W. Cooke, Respondent, v. Aaron A. Degrauw, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
112 N.Y. 658·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Catharine W. Cooke, Respondent, v. Aaron A. Degrauw, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Submitted December 11, 1888;
decided January 15, 1889.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, made February 6, 1888, which affirmed an order of Special Term sustaining exceptions to the allowance by the referee of the claim of the appellant as a valid claim against funds in the hands of a receiver.
Edward 8. Olvneh for appellant.
Payson Merrill, William, G. Wilson, WilUam R. Mamtim,, William, Allam, and W. PL. Pfewman for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Order affirmed.