Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of Frank L. Froment et al., Appellants, to Establish a Lien on a Vessel in the Custody of William J. Burlee, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Respondent, 1906 — 185 N.Y. 553 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
In the Matter of the Application of Frank L. Froment et al., Appellants, to Establish a Lien on a Vessel in the Custody of William J. Burlee, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Respondent
185 N.Y. 553·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Frank L. Froment et al., Appellants, to Establish a Lien on a Vessel in the Custody of William J. Burlee, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Respondent.
(Submitted April 30, 1906;
decided May 8, 1906.)
[MAJORITY]
Motion to amend remittitur. (See 184 N. Y. 568.)
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. There is no necessity for any amendment, since the effect of the modification of the order of the Appellate ■ Division is to require a new trial, the result of which will determine the ultimate right to costs. When the Appellate Division’s order of reversal was modified by this court the judgments for costs entered upon the decisions of the ti'ial court and' of the Appellate Division were rendered ineffectual.