General
ALGOMA LUMBER COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent
68 F.2d 993·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ALGOMA LUMBER COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.
No. 6716.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 20, 1934.
See, also, 56 F.(2d) 774 ; 64 F.(2d) 618.
McCutchen, Olney, Mannon & Greene, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners.
Robert E. Healy, Chief Counsel, Federal Trade Comm., of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and GARRJSCHT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This matter coming on for further proceedings, ordered mandate of Supreme Court of the United States in this cause filed 54 S. Ct. 67, 78 L. Ed.-; that the decree of this court, filed and entered April 4, 1933 [64 F.(2d) 618] be vacated and set aside; that a decree he filed and entered in accordance with the mandate of the said Supreme Court; and that the mandate of this court issue forthwith.