General
Norman S. Dike, as Receiver of Edward M. Field et al., Appellant, v. Anthony J. Drexel et al., Respondents
155 N.Y. 637·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Norman S. Dike, as Receiver of Edward M. Field et al., Appellant, v. Anthony J. Drexel et al., Respondents.
Dike v. Drexel, 11 App. Div. 77, affirmed.
(Argued January 20, 1898;
decided March 1, 1898.)
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 31, 1896, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint upon the merits, on trial at Special Term.
James L. Bishop and Frederic A. Ward for appellant.
Joseph II. Ohoate and Francis Lynde Stetson for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.