Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joseph Leavy, Appellant, v. Mary C. Gardner, individually and as Executrix, Respondent, 1875 — 63 N.Y. 624 · caselaw · US
General
Joseph Leavy, Appellant, v. Mary C. Gardner, individually and as Executrix, Respondent
63 N.Y. 624·New York Court of Appeals·1875·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph Leavy, Appellant, v. Mary C. Gardner, individually and as Executrix, Respondent.
(Argued November 16,1875;
decided November 23, 1875.)
A proceeding to foreclose a mechanic’s lien under the mechanic’s lien law, for the city of New York, of 1863 (chap. 600, Laws of 1863), is not an action within section 131 of the Code.
The proceeding abates upon the death of the defendant, and cannot be revived against his devisees or representatives.
This was a proceeding to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon premises in the city of New York, created under the act of 1863. (Chap. 500, Laws of 1863.) It was commenced against William Gardner, then owner of the premises, who, after the matter was at issue, died. Plaintiff thereupon, upon motion, obtained an order that the proceedings be continued against Mary C. Gardner, executrix and sole devisee of the deceased. The order was reversed by the General Term. Held, as above. (See Hallaban v. Herbert, 57 N. Y., 409.)
Thomas H. Hubbard for the appellant. ,
Win. A. Huer for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Andrews, J.,]
Andrews, J.,
reads for affirmance of order of General Term.
All concur.
Order affirmed.