General
RHOADES et al. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ABINGTON TOWNSHIP et al.
389 U.S. 11·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
RHOADES et al. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ABINGTON TOWNSHIP et al.
No. 225.
Decided October 9, 1967.
Franklin C. Salisbury for appellants.
William C. Bennett, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, John P. McCord, Deputy Attorney General, and Edward Friedman for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and William B. Ball for Paul et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam. Mr. Justice Douglas]
Per Curiam.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Douglas
is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.